The
publishing last month by the Urban
Institute of its latest report, Less
Than Equal: Racial Disparities in Wealth Distribution
and an email sent out by Daniel Garza, Jr. of the LIBRE
Initiative welcoming the report and its conclusions. This
prompted me to go and look on the Being Latino! website to see what
it had to say about what economic opportunity and freedom should mean
to Latinos. As anyone who reads the website faithfully can tell you,
it told a sad tale that can be summarized as 'blame big business and
white fat-cat businessmen for continuing to marginalize Latinos and
other minority groups.
Going
back to an article
published last year, an unnamed contributor took Mr. Garza to task
for being naive enough to trust in the mechanics of what he or she
saw as an unfair system that merely promises equal opportunity but
not necessarily equal result. The writer also chided Mr. Garza for
being against government regulation to make sure that a fair field of
play exists for everyone. The writer, whomever he or she is, should
either (A)read and reviewed the LIBRE Initiative's website and/or
(B)presented those positions honestly.
We
should all read the newly released report from a non-partisan think
tank originally envisioned by President Lyndon Johnson of the Great
Society fame and the intellectual cream of the golden age of JFK's
Camel ot and look hard at its conclusion: “...it
raises the question of whether social welfare
policies paytoo little attention to wealth building and mobility
relative to consumption and income.
Because
Hispanics and blacks are disproportionately low income, their wealth
building is strongly affected by policies aimed at low-income
families. Right now, safety net policies emphasize consumption: the
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Temporary Assistance
for Needy Families, for example, try to ensure that families
haveenough food to eat and other basic necessities.Many safety net programs even discouragesaving: families can become ineligible if they have a few thousand dollars in savings. Wealth-building policies, on the other hand, are delivered as tax subsidies for homeownership and retirement. Since families of color are less likely to be able to use these subsidies, they benefit little or not at all .”
That
is right, gentle reader! Your eyes are not deceiving you. The
reforms that Mr. Garza and the LIBRE Initiative are calling for
regarding federal spending policy and federal regulations are exactly
those suggested by the Urban Institute, a child of the liberal Great
Society movement. Those so-called liberals and progressives who even
today are calling for more federal regulation of business and the
creation of a larger federal nanny state are actually the ones who
are leading the charge to continue to trap millions and millions of
poor Americans, many of them Latinos, in a never-ending cycle of
poverty and increased gap in wealth accumulation.
By Being Latino Contributor, Jeffery Cassity Jeffery Cassity is a mostly socially-liberal, fiscally-conservative Anglo male who is involved in his local Hispanic community as the widower of a 1st generation Mexican-American woman and his active, some would say hyperactive, membership in the local Council of the League of Latin American Citizens(LULAC).
No comments:
Post a Comment